Prognostic implication of lung ultrasound in heart failure: pooled analysis of international cohorts.

BACKGROUND: Lung ultrasound (LUS) is often used to assess congestion in heart failure (HF). In this study, we assessed the prognostic role of LUS in HF patients at admission and hospital discharge, and in an out-patient setting and explored whether clinical factors (age, sex, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and atrial fibrillation) impact the prognostic value of LUS findings. Further, we assessed the incremental prognostic value of LUS on top of AHEAD and MAGGIC clinical risk scores. METHODS AND RESULTS: We pooled data of patients hospitalized for HF or followed-up in out-patient clinics from international cohorts. We enrolled 1,947 patients, at admission (n=578), discharge (n=389) and in out-patient clinic (n=980). Total LUS B-line count was calculated for the 8-zone scanning protocol. The primary outcome was a composite of re-hospitalization for HF and all-cause death. Compared to those in the lower tertiles of B-lines, patients in the highest tertile were older, more likely to have signs of HF and higher NT-proBNP levels. A higher number of B-lines was associated with increased risk of primary outcome at discharge (Tertile3 vs Tertile1: adjustedHR= 5.74 (3.26- 10.12), p<0.0001) and in out-patients (Tertile3 vs Tertile1: adjustedHR= 2.66 (1.08- 6.54), p=0.033). Age and LVEF did not influence the prognostic capacity of LUS in different clinical settings. Adding B-line count to MAGGIC and AHEAD scores improved net reclassification significantly in all three clinical settings. CONCLUSION: A higher number of B-lines in patients with HF was associated with increased risk of morbidity and mortality, regardless of the clinical setting.

Proteomic profiles of left atrial volume and its influence on response to spironolactone: Findings from the HOMAGE trial and STANISLAS cohort.

AIMS: High left ventricular filling pressure increases left atrial volume and causes myocardial fibrosis, which may decrease with spironolactone. We studied clinical and proteomic characteristics associated with left atrial volume indexed by body surface area (LAVi), and whether LAVi influences the response to spironolactone on biomarker expression and clinical variables. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the HOMAGE trial, where people at risk of heart failure were randomized to spironolactone or control, we analysed 421 participants with available LAVi and 276 proteomic measurements (Olink) at baseline, month 1 and 9 (mean age 73 ± 6 years; women 26%; LAVi 32 ± 9 ml/m2). Circulating proteins associated with LAVi were also assessed in asymptomatic individuals from a population-based cohort (STANISLAS; n = 1640; mean age 49 ± 14 years; women 51%; LAVi 23 ± 7 ml/m2). In both studies, greater LAVi was significantly associated with greater left ventricular masses and volumes. In HOMAGE, after adjustment and correction for multiple testing, greater LAVi was associated with higher concentrations of matrix metallopeptidase-2 (MMP-2), insulin-like growth factor binding protein-2 (IGFBP-2) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) (false discovery rates [FDR] <0.05). These associations were externally replicated in STANISLAS (all FDR <0.05). Among these biomarkers, spironolactone decreased concentrations of MMP-2 and NT-proBNP, regardless of baseline LAVi (pinteraction > 0.10). Spironolactone also significantly reduced LAVi, improved left ventricular ejection fraction, lowered E/e', blood pressure and serum procollagen type I C-terminal propeptide (PICP) concentration, a collagen synthesis marker, regardless of baseline LAVi (pinteraction > 0.10). CONCLUSION: In individuals without heart failure, LAVi was associated with MMP-2, IGFBP-2 and NT-proBNP. Spironolactone reduced these biomarker concentrations as well as LAVi and PICP, irrespective of left atrial size.

Serial daily lactate levels association with 30-day outcome in cardiogenic shock patients treated with VA-ECMO: a post-hoc analysis of the HYPO-ECMO study.

BACKGROUND: Reliable predictors of outcomes in venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) therapy are limited. While elevated lactate levels over time have been linked to outcomes in cardiogenic shock (CS), their significance in VA-ECMO-treated patients remains inconclusive. METHODS: We conducted a post hoc analysis of data from the HYPO-ECMO trial, which compared normothermia to moderate hypothermia in CS patients supported by VA-ECMO. We examined daily lactate levels collected over a week to assess their correlation with 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Among the 318 out of 334 patients (95%) with baseline lactate measurements, 66 had normal levels (< 2.2 mmol/l, 21%). No difference was found in lactate course between moderate hypothermia and normothermia groups. Lactate levels were consistently higher in non-survivors at each time point (p = 0.0002). Baseline hyperlactatemia was associated with an increased risk of death (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 1.85 (1.12-3.05), p = 0.016). When considering all time points, lactate levels during the ICU stay were significantly and gradually associated with a higher risk of death (p < 0.0001). In the overall population, a decrease in lactate levels was not linked to 30-day mortality. However, patients with baseline hyperlactatemia exhibited a more significant decrease in lactate levels from day one to seven (p < 0.0001). In this group, survivors had a significantly greater decrease in lactate levels at day 1 compared to non-survivors (63% (48-77) versus 57% (21-75), p = 0.026). Patients experiencing a secondary increase in lactate (24%) had a worse prognosis (Hazard Ratio: 1.78 (1.21-2.61), p = 0.004), regardless of both baseline lactate levels and the occurrence of severe ischemic adverse events (intestinal and/or limb ischemia). CONCLUSIONS: The consistent and significant association between lactate levels, whether assessed at baseline or during ICU treatment, and the risk of mortality underscores the pivotal prognostic relevance of lactate levels in patients with CS undergoing VA-ECMO therapy. The study findings provide some novel insights, regarding the trend profile and the relevance of a second peak during the 7 day period after ECMO start. Trial Registration identifier NCT02754193 registered on 2016-04-12.

Poor in-hospital congestion improvement in acute heart failure patients classified according to LVEF: prognostic implications.

BACKGROUND: Residual congestion in acute heart failure (AHF) is associated with poor prognosis. However, there is a lack of data on the prognostic value of changes in a combined assessment of in-hospital congestion. The present study sought to assess the association between in-hospital congestion changes and subsequent prognosis according to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) classification. METHODS: Patients (N=244, 80.3±7.6 years, 50.8% male) admitted for acute HF in two European tertiary care centers underwent clinical assessment (congestion score included dyspnea at rest, rales, third heart sound, jugular venous distention, peripheral edema and hepatomegaly; simplified congestion score included rales and peripheral edema), echocardiography, lung ultrasound (LUS) and natriuretic peptides (NP) measurement at admission and discharge. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality and/or HF re-hospitalization. RESULTS: In the 244 considered patients (95 HF with reduced EF, 57 HF with mildly reduced EF and 92 HF with preserved EF), patients with limited improvement in clinical congestion score (hazard ratio 2.33, 95%CI 1.51 to 3.61, p=0.0001), NP levels (2.29, 95%CI 1.55 to 3.38, p<0.0001) and the number of B-lines (6.44, 95%CI 4.19 to 9.89, p<0.001) had a significantly higher risk of outcome compared to patients experiencing more sizeable decongestion. The same pattern of association was observed when adjusting for confounding factors. A limited improvement in clinical congestion score and in the number of B-lines was related to poor prognosis for all LVEF categories. CONCLUSIONS: In AHF, the degree of congestion reduction assessed over the in-hospital stay period can stratify the subsequent event risk. Limited reduction in both clinical congestion and B-lines number are related to poor prognosis, irrespective of HF subtype.

Long-term changes in cardiac remodelling in prevalent kidney graft recipients.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 15% of kidney transplant (KT) recipients develop de novo heart failure after KT. There are scarce data reporting the long-term changes in cardiac structure and function among KT recipients. Despite the improvement in renal function, transplant-related complications as well as immunosuppressive therapy could have an impact on cardiac remodelling during follow-up. We aimed to describe the long-term changes in echocardiographic parameters in prevalent KT recipients and identify the clinical and laboratory factors associated with these changes. METHODS: A centralised blinded review of two echocardiographic examinations after KT (on average after 17 and 39 months post-KT respectively) was performed among 80 patients (age 50.4 ± 16.2, diabetes 13.8% pre-KT), followed by linear regression to identify clinico-biological factors related to echocardiographic changes. RESULTS: Left atrial volume index (LAVI) increased significantly (34.2 ± 10.8 mL/m2vs. 37.6 ± 15.0 mL/m2, annualised delta 3.1 ± 11.4 mL/m2/year; p = 0.034) while left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) decreased (62.1 ± 9.0% vs. 59.7 ± 9.9%, annualised delta -2.7 ± 13.6%/year; p = 0.04). Male sex (ß = 8.112 ± 2.747; p < 0.01), pre-KT hypertension (ß = 9.725 ± 4.156; p < 0.05), graft from expanded criteria donor (ß = 3.791 ± 3.587; p < 0.05), and induction by anti-thymocyte globulin (ß = 7.920 ± 2.974; p = 0.01) were associated with an increase in LAVI during follow-up. Higher haemoglobin (>12.9 g/dL) at the time of the first echocardiography (ß = 6.029 ± 2.967; p < 0.05) and ACEi/ARB therapy (ß = 8.306 ± 3.161; p < 0.05) were associated with an increase in LVEF during follow-up. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the existence of long-term cardiac remodelling after KT despite dialysis cessation, characterised by an increase in LAVI and a decrease in LVEF. A better management of anaemia and using ACEi/ARB therapy may prevent such remodelling.

Use of the Win Ratio Analysis in Critical Care Trials.

Composite outcomes are commonly used in critical care trials to estimate the treatment effect of an intervention. A significant limitation of classical analytic approaches is that they assign equal statistical importance to each component in a composite, even if these do not have the same clinical importance (i.e., in a composite of death and organ failure, death is clearly more important). The win ratio (WR) method has been proposed as an alternative for trial outcomes evaluation, as it effectively assesses events based on their clinical relevance (i.e., hierarchical order) by comparing each patient in the intervention group with their counterparts in the control group. This statistical approach is increasingly used in cardiovascular outcome trials. However, WR may be useful to unveil treatment effects also in the critical care setting, because these trials are typically moderately sized, thus limiting the statistical power to detect small differences between groups, and often rely on composite outcomes that include several components of different clinical importance. Notably, the advantages of this approach may be offset by several drawbacks (such as ignoring ties and difficulties in selecting and ranking endpoints) and challenges in appropriate clinical interpretation (i.e., establishing clinical meaningfulness of the observed effect size). In this perspective article, we present some key elements to implementing WR statistics in critical care trials, providing an overview of strengths, drawbacks, and potential applications of this method. To illustrate, we conduct a reevaluation of the HYPO-ECMO (Hypothermia during Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation) trial using the WR framework as a case example.

Multi-modality assessment of congestion in acute heart failure: Associations with left ventricular ejection fraction and prognosis.

BACKGROUND: Integrating clinical examination with ultrasound measures of congestion could improve risk stratification in patients hospitalized with acute heart failure (AHF). AIM: To investigate the prevalence of clinical, echocardiographic and lung ultrasound (LUS) signs of congestion according to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and their association with prognosis in patients with AHF. METHODS: We pooled the data of four cohorts of patients (N = 601, 74.9±10.8 years, 59 % men) with AHF and analysed six features of congestion at enrolment: clinical (peripheral oedema and respiratory rales), biochemical (BNP/NT-proBNP≥median), echocardiographic (inferior vena cava (IVC)≥21 mm, pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP)≥40 mmHg, E/e'≥15) and B-lines ≥25 (8-zones) in those with reduced (<40 %, HFrEF), mildly reduced (40-49 %, HFmrEF and preserved (≥50 %HFpEF) LVEF. RESULTS: Compared to patients with HFmrEF (n = 110) and HFpEF (n = 201), those with HFrEF (N = 290) had higher natriuretic peptides, but prevalence of clinical (39 %), echocardiographic (IVC≥21 mm: 56 %, E/e'≥15: 57 %, PASP≥40 mmHg: 76 %) and LUS (48 %) signs of congestion was similar. In multivariable analysis, clinical (HR: 3.24(2.15-4.86), p < 0.001), echocardiographic [(IVC≥21 mm (HR:1.91, 1.21-3.03, p=0.006); E/e'≥15 (HR:1.54, 1.04-2.28, p = 0.031)] and LUS (HR:2.08, 1.34-3.24, p = 0.001) signs of congestion were significantly associated with all-cause mortality and/or HF re-hospitalization. Adding echocardiographic and LUS features of congestion to a model than included age, sex, systolic blood pressure, clinical congestion and natriuretic peptides, improved prediction at 90 and 180 days. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical and ultrasound signs of congestion are highly prevalent in patients with AHF, regardless of LVEF and their combined assessment improves risk stratification.

When to use either spironolactone, eplerenone or finerenone in the spectrum of cardiorenal diseases.

Kidney disease frequently coexists with cardiovascular diseases, and this dual presence significantly amplifies the risk of adverse clinical outcomes. Shared pathophysiological mechanisms and common cardiovascular risk factors contribute to the increased expression of mineralocorticoid receptors, which in turn can drive the progression of chronic cardiovascular-kidney disorder. The steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) spironolactone and eplerenone have demonstrated the efficacy in improving patient outcomes in cases of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction or those after a myocardial infarction, but have limited value in patients with chronic kidney disease. The non-steroidal MRA finerenone has now established itself as a foundational guideline-recommended therapy in patients with diabetic kidney disease. To date, these pharmacological agents have been developed in distinct patient populations. The consequences of their distinct pharmacological profiles necessitate further consideration. They have not undergone testing across the entire spectrum of cardiorenal scenarios, and the evidence base is currently being complemented with ongoing trials. In this review, we aim to synthesize the existing body of evidence and chart the future trajectory for the use of spironolactone, eplerenone and finerenone in improving clinical outcomes across the diverse spectrum of cardiorenal diseases. By consolidating the current state of knowledge, we seek to provide valuable insights for informed decision-making in the management of patients with these complex and interconnected conditions.

Phenotyping patients with ischaemic heart disease at risk of developing heart failure: an analysis of the HOMAGE trial.

AIMS: We aim to characterize the clinical and proteomic profiles of patients at risk of developing heart failure (HF), with and without coronary artery disease (CAD) or prior myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS AND RESULTS: HOMAGE evaluated the effect of spironolactone on plasma and serum markers of fibrosis over 9 months of follow-up in participants with (or at risk of having) CAD, and raised natriuretic peptides. In this post hoc analysis, patients were classified as (i) neither CAD nor MI; (ii) CAD; or (iii) MI. Proteomic between-group differences were evaluated through logistic regression and narrowed using backward stepwise selection and bootstrapping. Among the 527 participants, 28% had neither CAD or MI, 31% had CAD, and 41% had prior MI. Compared with people with neither CAD nor MI, those with CAD had higher baseline plasma concentrations of matrix metalloproteinase-7 (MMP-7), galectin-4 (GAL4), plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1), and lower plasma peptidoglycan recognition protein 1 (PGLYRP1), whilst those with a history of MI had higher plasma MMP-7, neurotrophin-3 (NT3), pulmonary surfactant-associated protein D (PSPD), and lower plasma tumour necrosis factor-related activation-induced cytokine (TRANCE). Proteomic signatures were similar for patients with CAD or prior MI. Treatment with spironolactone was associated with an increase of MMP7, NT3, and PGLYRP1 at 9 months. CONCLUSIONS: In patients at risk of developing HF, those with CAD or MI had a different proteomic profile regarding inflammatory, immunological, and collagen catabolic processes.

Lung ultrasound and diuretic therapy in chronic heart failure: a randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Lung congestion is frequent in heart failure (HF) and is associated with symptoms and poor prognosis. Lung ultrasound (LUS) identification of B-lines may help refining congestion assessment on top of usual care. Three small trials comparing LUS-guided therapy to usual care in HF suggested that LUS-guided therapy could reduce urgent HF visits. However, to our knowledge, the usefulness of LUS in influencing loop diuretic dose adjustment in ambulatory chronic HF has not been studied. AIMS: To study whether to show or not LUS results to the HF assistant physician would change loop diuretic adjustments in "stable" chronic ambulatory HF patients. METHODS: Prospective randomised single-blinded trial comparing two strategies: (1) open 8-zone LUS with B-line results available to clinicians, or (2) blind LUS. The primary outcome was change in loop diuretic dose (up- or down-titration). RESULTS: A total of 139 patients entered the trial, 70 were randomised to blind LUS and 69 to open LUS. The median (percentile25-75) age was 72 (63-82) years, 82 (62%) were men, and the median LVEF was 39 (31-51) %. Randomisation groups were well balanced. Furosemide dose changes (up- and down-titration) were more frequent among patients in whom LUS results were open to the assistant physician: 13 (18.6%) in blind LUS vs. 22 (31.9%) in open LUS, OR 2.55, 95%CI 1.07-6.06. Furosemide dose changes (up- and down-titration) were more frequent and correlated significantly with the number of B-lines when LUS results were open (Rho = 0.30, P = 0.014), but not when LUS results were blinded (Rho = 0.19, P = 0.13). Compared to blind LUS, when LUS results were open, clinicians were more likely to up-titrate furosemide dose if the result "presence of pulmonary congestion" was identified and more likely to decrease furosemide dose in the case of an "absence of pulmonary congestion" result. The risk of HF events or cardiovascular death did not differ by randomisation group: 8 (11.4%) in blind LUS vs. 8 (11.6%) in open LUS. CONCLUSIONS: Showing the results of LUS B-lines to assistant physicians allowed more frequent loop diuretic changes (both up- and down-titration), which suggests that LUS may be used to tailor diuretic therapy to each patient congestion status.

High Risk of Stroke in Patients With Worsening Heart Failure, Reduced Ejection Fraction, Coronary Heart Disease and Sinus Rhythm: Risk Prediction Score Analysis From the COMMANDER-HF Trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and sinus rhythm have a heightened risk of stroke. Whether anticoagulation benefits these patients is uncertain. In this post hoc analysis of the A Study to Assess the Effectiveness and Safety of Rivaroxaban in Reducing the Risk of Death, Myocardial Infarction, or Stroke in Participants with Heart Failure and Coronary Artery Disease Following an Episode of Decompensated Heart Failure (COMMANDER-HF) trial we evaluated how a previously validated risk model consisting of 3 variables (history of prior stroke, insulin-treated diabetes, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide level) would perform, compared with plasma d-dimer, for stroke prediction and estimation of the benefit of low-dose rivaroxaban. METHODS AND RESULTS: Stroke risk and treatment effect were computed across risk score and plasma d-dimer tertiles. Risk score was available in 58% of the COMMANDER-HF population (n = 2928). Over a median follow-up of 512 days (range 342-747 days), 60 patients experienced a stroke (14.6 per 1000 patient-years). The risk model did not identify patients at higher risk of stroke and showed a low overall prognostic performance (C-index = 0.53). The effect of rivaroxaban on stroke was homogeneous across risk score tertiles (P-interaction = .67). Among patients in whom the risk score was estimated, d-dimer was available in 2343 (80%). d-dimer had an acceptable discrimination performance for stroke prediction (C-index = 0.66) and higher plasma d-dimer concentrations were associated with higher rates of stroke (ie, tertile 3 vs tertile 1, hazard ratio 3.65, 95% confidence interval 1.59-8.39, P = .002). Treatment with low-dose rivaroxaban reduced the incidence of stroke in patients at highest risk by d-dimer levels (ie, >515 ng/mL, hazard ratio 0.42, 95% confidence interval 0.18-0.95, P-interaction = .074), without any safety concerns. CONCLUSIONS: In our analysis, plasma d-dimer concentrations performed better than a previously described 3-variable risk score for stroke prediction in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, a recent clinical worsening and sinus rhythm as enrolled in the COMMANDER-HF trial. In these patients, a raised plasma d-dimer concentration identified patients who might benefit most from rivaroxaban.

Risk of readmission and death after hospitalization for worsening heart failure: Role of post-discharge follow-up visits in a real-world study from the Grand Est Region of France.

AIMS: Patients who experience hospitalizations due to heart failure (HF) face a significant risk of readmission and mortality. Our objective was to evaluate whether the risk of hospitalization and mortality following discharge from HF hospitalization differed based on adherence to the outpatient follow-up (FU) protocol comprising an appointment with a general practitioner (GP) within 15 days, a cardiologist within 2 months or both (termed combined FU). METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied all adults admitted for a first HF hospitalization from 2016 to 2020 in France's Grand Est region. Association between adherence to outpatient FU and outcomes were assessed with time-dependent survival analysis model. Among 67 476 admitted patients (mean age 80.3 ± 11.3 years, 53% women), 62 156 patients (92.2%) were discharged alive and followed for 723 (317-1276) days. Combined FU within 2 months was used in 21.1% of patients, with lower rates among >85 years, women, and those with higher comorbidity levels (p < 0.0001 for all). Combined FU was associated with a lower 1-year death or rehospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88-0.94, p < 0.0001) mostly related to lower mortality (adjusted HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.62-0.68, p < 0.0001) whereas HF readmission was higher (adjusted HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.15-1.24, p < 0.0001). When analysing components of combined FU separately, 1-year mortality was more related to cardiologist FU (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.62-0.67, p < 0.0001), than GP FU (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.85-0.90, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Combined FU is carried out in a minority of patients following HF hospitalization, yet it is linked to a substantial reduction in 1-year mortality, albeit at the expense of an increase in HF hospitalizations.

Hypotension in heart failure is less harmful if associated with high or increasing doses of heart failure medication: Insights from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry.

AIMS: Heart failure (HF) medication may reduce blood pressure (BP). Low BP is associated with worse outcomes but how this association is modified by HF medication has not been studied. We evaluated the association between BP and outcomes according to HF medication dose in HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied HFrEF patients from the Swedish HF registry (2000-2018). Associations between systolic BP (SBP) and cardiovascular death (CVD) and/or HF hospitalization (HFH) were analysed according to doses of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors, beta-blockers and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA). Among 42 040 patients (median age 74.0), lower baseline SBP was associated with higher risk of CVD/HFH (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] per 10 mmHg higher SBP: 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92-0.93), which was less high risk under optimized RAS inhibitor and beta-blocker doses (10% decrease in event rates per 10 mmHg SBP increase in untreated patients vs. 7% decrease in patients at maximum dose, both adjusted p < 0.02). Among the 13 761 patients with repeated measurements, 9.9% reported a SBP decrease >10 mmHg when HF medication doses were increased, whereas 24.6% reported a SBP decrease >10 mmHg with stable/decreasing doses. Decreasing SBP was associated with higher risk of CVD/HFH in patients with stable (HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.04-1.17) or decreasing (HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.18-1.42) HF medication dose but not in patients with an increase in doses (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.86-1.02). CONCLUSIONS: The association of lower SBP with higher risk of CVD/HFH is attenuated in patients with optimized HF medication. These results suggest that low or declining SBP should not limit HF medication optimization.

Potassium canrenoate in brain-dead organ donors: a randomised controlled clinical trial protocol (CANREO-PMO).

INTRODUCTION: Ischaemia/reperfusion injuries (IRIs) are associated with poorer survival of kidney grafts from expanded criteria donors. Preclinical studies have shown that mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) prevent acute and chronic post-ischaemic renal dysfunction by limiting IRI. However, data concerning the safety of MRAs in brain-dead donor patients are scarce. We seek to investigate the tolerance of MRAs on the haemodynamics in this population. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: CANREO-PMO is a randomised, controlled, single-centre, double-blind study. Brain-dead organ donors hospitalised in intensive care are randomised 1:1 after consent to receive 200 mg potassium canrenoate or its matching placebo every 6 hours until organ procurement. The primary outcome is a hierarchical composite endpoint that includes: (1) cardiocirculatory arrest, (2) the impossibility of kidney procurement, (3) the average hourly dose of norepinephrine/epinephrine between randomisation and departure to the operating room, and (4) the average hourly volume of crystalloids and/or colloids received. Thirty-six patients will be included. The secondary endpoints evaluated among the graft recipients are the: (1) vital status of the kidney graft recipients and serum creatinine level with estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) according to Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) at 3 months after renal transplantation, (2) percentage of patients dependent on dialysis and/or with an estimated GFR <20 mL/min/1.73 m2 at 3 months, (3) vital status of the kidney graft recipients at 3 months, and (4) vital status of the kidney graft recipients and creatinine levels (in µmol/L), with the estimated GFR according to CKD-EPI (in mL/min/1.73 m2), at 1 year, 3 years and 10 years after transplantation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This trial has full ethical approval (Comité de Protection des Personnes: CPP Ouest II-ANGERS, France), and the written consent of relatives will be obtained. Results will be reported at conferences, peer-reviewed publications and using social media channels. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04714710.

Optimización de los tratamientos de la insuficiencia cardiaca con fracción de eyección reducida en la práctica diaria: propuesta de un grupo de expertos / Optimisation of treatments for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in routine practice: a position statement from a panel of experts

El tratamiento de los pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca con fracción de eyección reducida (IC-FEr) con una combinación de 4 clases de fármacos se recomienda en las principales guías de práctica clínica internacionales. Sin embargo, no especifican cómo deben introducirse y ajustarse estos tratamientos. En consecuencia, muchos pacientes con IC-FEr no pasan a un régimen de tratamiento optimizado. El objetivo de esta revisión es proponer un algoritmo pragmático para optimizar el tratamiento, diseñado para que sea lo más fácil posible de aplicar en la práctica diaria. El primer objetivo es garantizar que las 4 clases de medicación recomendadas se inicien cuanto antes para establecer una terapia eficaz, incluso a dosis bajas. Esto se considera preferible a iniciar menos medicamentos a una dosis máxima. El segundo objetivo es garantizar que los intervalos entre la introducción de los medicamentos y entre los distintos pasos de titulación sean lo más breves posible, por la seguridad del paciente. Se hacen propuestas específicas para los pacientes de edad avanzada (> 75 años) frágiles, y para aquellos con trastornos del ritmo cardiaco. La aplicación de este algoritmo debería permitir alcanzar un protocolo de tratamiento óptimo en un plazo de 2 meses para la mayoría de los pacientes. Este debe ser nuestro objetivo en el tratamiento de la IC-FEr. (AU)

Major international practice guidelines recommend the use of a combination of 4 medication classes in the treatment of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) but do not specify how these treatments should be introduced and up-titrated. Consequently, many patients with HFrEF do not receive an optimized treatment regimen. This review proposes a pragmatic algorithm for treatment optimization designed to be easily applied in routine practice. The first goal is to ensure that all 4 recommended medication classes are initiated as early as possible to establish effective therapy, even at a low dose. This is considered preferable to starting fewer medications at a maximum dose. The second goal is to ensure that the intervals between the introduction of different medications and between different titration steps are as short as possible to ensure patient safety. Specific proposals are made for older patients (> 75 years) who are frail, and for those with cardiac rhythm disorders. Application of this algorithm should allow an optimal treatment protocol to be achieved within 2-months in most patients, which should the treatment goal in HFrEF. (AU)

Role of aldosterone in mid- and long-term left ventricular remodelling after acute myocardial infarction: The REMI study.

AIMS: Whether aldosterone levels after myocardial infarction (MI) are associated with mid- and long-term left ventricular (LV) remodelling in the era of systematic use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors is uncertain. We prospectively investigated the relationship between aldosterone levels and mid- and long-term LV remodelling in patients with acute MI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Plasma aldosterone was measured in 119 patients successfully treated by primary percutaneous coronary angioplasty for a first acute ST-elevation MI (STEMI) 2-4 days after the acute event. LV volumes were assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in the same timeframe and 6 months later. LV assessment was repeated by TTE 3-9 years after MI (n = 80). The median aldosterone level at baseline was 23.1 [16.8; 33.1] pg/ml. In the multivariable model, higher post-MI aldosterone concentration was significantly associated with more pronounced increase in LV end-diastolic volume index (TTE: ß ± standard error [SE]: 0.113 ± 0.046, p = 0.015; CMR: ß ± SE: 0.098 ± 0.040, p = 0.015) and LV end-systolic volume index (TTE: ß ± SE: 0.083 ± 0.030, p = 0.008; CMR: ß ± SE: 0.064 ± 0.032, p = 0.048) at 6-month follow-up, regardless of the method of assessment. This result was consistent also in patients with a LV ejection fraction (LVEF) >40%. The association between baseline plasma aldosterone and adverse LV remodelling did not persist at the 3-9-year follow-up evaluation. CONCLUSION: Aldosterone concentration in the acute phase was associated with adverse LV remodelling in the medium term, even in the subgroup of patients with LVEF >40%, suggesting a potential role of the mineralocorticoid system in post-MI adverse remodelling. Plasma aldosterone was no longer associated with LV remodelling in the long term (NCT01109225).